Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.
Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)
As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.
The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).
Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
今天是地陷里头好面子生活里一堆鸡毛蒜皮小事的中年男性朴科长
虽然有点魔改但不讨厌，达妹太美，酗酒是为了凸显女性的痛苦吧。男主太丑了，而且永远一副要哭出来的表情，感觉配不上女主。综上所述BBC萨莉那个版本还是好的，男主也确实帅。
Anne不是个讨喜的角色，但达妹演得还成，取景也很有感觉，放在bridgerton的世界观里还能看看，本来想给四星，可这个结局吧着实拉低好感，直接从有点文艺片气质的创新型古典片降低到烂俗的三流网络大电影。表哥结婚就结婚，趁机说教一通是想干嘛？还有海边悬崖kiss，大概是想效仿05版PP，也就学了个皮毛。结局得好好改改，总体挺可惜的。
有一个设定不尽合理的片子，雨水一会就下满了500米的洞，黄色塑料水桶在500米水下丝毫不变形呵呵哒
摄影和美术赏心悦目，比以往的版本都更“电影”，但是这改编也太《伦敦生活》了吧？
差一点就两星。所有好的台词都是奥斯丁原话，后加的台词听完我直摇头。我对啥样的改编都没有意见只要保留人物的核心精神就好了，但可惜这部没有。诺桑觉寺、艾玛非常适合这样调皮的改编，唯独劝导是一个成熟女人的最后美好幻想，不容亵渎🙏
政治正确，且女主活泼得像个穿越的现代人，我真的会谢
只有风景是好的。哪怕再上两盘菜呢？和父亲的关系根本没处理好，更谈何爱情。
三星半。用21世纪的笔法改编18世纪的故事竟然有些有趣，让永远get不到奥斯丁的我看得进津津有味。但是男女主真的没啥化学反应。导演是不是很爱伦敦生活？总是在这里那里看到一些伦敦生活的影子，人间清醒的达妹非常像客观理智版的fleabag
改编的什么玩意儿。
6.1分。美食什么的根本就不存在的😂这是一部意大利风景小镇托斯卡纳的旅游宣传片。故事还凑合。
非常平庸的电影，但谁能拒绝托斯卡纳的阳光和美食呢
我的天哪，浪费人生中的两个小时。怎么会有这么多过时的笑料，编剧是多少岁高龄了？还有导演让演员们泡在水里最后拍出来了个这真的不会被骂吗？
●最后结局，俩人腻歪。
作为劝导狂饭，我觉得还可以，甚至有种别样的感动。
看到将近一半就忍不住了，没看过原著也不要紧，写在人物脸上的彼此抗拒，达妹好像很偏文学女性人设她的声音是很合适但是太平淡了，没有人身攻击男主长相就不适合爱情片很憨憨，你还要忍受片子不断夸他是帅哥，这俩人好无趣
差一点就两星。所有好的台词都是奥斯丁原话，后加的台词听完我直摇头。我对啥样的改编都没有意见只要保留人物的核心精神就好了，但可惜这部没有。诺桑觉寺、艾玛非常适合这样调皮的改编，唯独劝导是一个成熟女人的最后美好幻想，不容亵渎🙏
感情线太尴尬了太尴尬了太尴尬了。就不能单纯拍美食风情片吗？一招毁所有。
不如听的一期愤怒的repo播客精彩。fleabag||| ps播客是谢金鱼老师，推荐
給創新點贊，尤其是後面那個水箱哈哈哈哈哈三分靠打拼七分靠運氣
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
