Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
章子怡演技好
可能这是唯一一部能让我流泪的007吧。明知是套路，还是妥妥地、心甘情愿地被套路。
照亮别人的东西
四个故事水准都很高，其中应该说《诗》的情感最充沛，李媛老师的剧本以及章子怡的表演张力佩服，四部片子最大感触是诚意都很够，几位小演员表现也很出色，值得一看
麻花的中规中矩，硬让你笑！
说的是父辈，赞美的是祖国。质量整体不高，鸭先知算是亮点。
其实还行吧，虽然007有孩子和为女人而死很扯，以及下一任007更扯，但还不算扯得太过分，基本水准还是有的
徐峥果然承包了我的笑点😂
吴京的做开篇确实很好，有气势有情绪，国仇家恨，磅礴大气，以后能拍成长片绝对很好。
Daniel Craig的James Bond从一开始就彻底改变了历代Bond的种种印象，他的五部作品也是在特工经典电影与现代特工电影之间的过渡的摸索；No Time to Die可以说既出乎意料而又在情理之中，这整部戏都像是对Daniel最后的盛大告别，而放在007系列中又是颇有改革风味的一部；无论后续的007系列走向何方，不可否认的是Daniel Craig通过这十五年已久的007任期给观众们带来了太多新的改变。
鸭先知＝少年行＞乘风＞诗。
Daniel Craig谢幕演出，虽是最丑邦德也是成功代表…Lea和新手特工Ana都太美，整部剧颜值担当…反派safin好丑，面瘫脸…动作调情拯救世界是永远的主题…虽然没搞懂神奇的DNA纳米机器人…
燃料是点燃自己
新世界的开始
抗日神剧的风格，特效糟糕，剧情还没有逻辑
徐峥深谙寓教于乐切题之术，章子怡在苦情里拍出了柔韧。吴京最差，拍马战没战术，全拍马断腿受伤，拍牺牲靠硬煽情，审美更谈不上。
也就吴京那部分还能看点，其他三个部分都是啥？既不搞笑，煽情也不好看
沒看過前面的片子，所以看這部片子的前半部分一頭霧水，很想睡覺。後半段大概理解了前面的情節後開始入戲了。像007這樣的男人不死也很難過安穩退休生活，仇敵太多，何況還有了家庭作累贅
徐峥（整体照搬了韦斯安德森）＞章子怡＞吴京＞沈腾。不知道是不是上赶疫情开工的缘故，这部和前两集相比总有一种赶工上架的感觉。
我的孩子
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
