假声和真声的区别 高清

评分:
9.0 推荐

分类: 喜剧片 1992

导演: 西里斯科什·慕克吉

剧情介绍

喜剧,讲一个男人通过装假胡子装扮成兄弟两个人,周旋于女友和未来岳父之间,因为岳父喜欢有胡子的人,认为有胡子的人成熟稳重。Ramprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma (Amol Palekar) is looking for a better paying job. He and his sister Ratna (Manju Singh) have no relatives or acquaintances except Dr. Kedar (David). Dr.Kedar tells him about Bhavani Shankar's (Utpal Dutt) firm known as Urmila Traders. Shankar is a weird man. He is a man of traditional values, hence he naturally hates youth wearing modern clothes. He is a sports fan, but thinks lowly of youth knowing anything about sports. But his most weird trait is hatred towards men without moustaches. He thinks that men without moustaches are characterless.Ramprasad has a moustache. He takes care of other problems by wearing kurta & feigning ignorance about sports. Bhavani hires him immediately. Ram is a hardworking guy, so Bhavani (& Ram) have no problems. However, Ram once takes leave by pretending that his mother (who died many years ago) has taken ill, and goes to watch a hockey match. Bhavani Shankar, who also attended the match, sees him there.The next day Bhavani summons Ramprasad to his office and asks him about the Hockey match. Remembering the plot of a movie a friend of his is shooting, Ram convinces Bhavani Shankar that he had seen his "moustache-less" identical twin Lucky (alias Lakshmanprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma) at the stadium.Bhavani Shankar buys his argument & feels bad about accusing him and decides to make amends by hiring Lucky to teach his daughter Urmila (Bindiya Goswami) music. Ramprasad reluctantly shaves his moustache to become Lucky and starts to teach music to Urmila. He is helped by his actor friend Deven Verma (playing himself).Now Urmila aka Urmi is the exact opposite of her father. She takes immediate liking to Lucky, while Ram is barely noticed by her. Bhavani notices this & gives Ram another job to tutor on the pretext of her exams. Meanwhile, Mrs. Srivastav (Dina Pathak), a socialite, is roped to play the part of Ram, "Lakshman" & Ratna's mother. Like Ram, she also ends up playing her own twin in front of Bhavani.Ram decides to tell Urmila the truth. Urmila tells him to tell the truth to Bhavani as well. Ram goes to Bhavani to tell the truth, but Bhavani sees Ram's moustache giving away. Bhavani exposes Ram, but ends up thinking that Lucky murdered Ram & impersonated him to marry Urmila.In a hilarious chase that follows, Bhavani ends up totalling a police jeep. The Senior Inspector (Om Prakash) mistakes him for a thug named Pascal D'Costa & is about to lock him up in the jail. Only when his Inspector identifies Bhavani Shankar by his real identity is he freed. By now, a harried Bhavani has developed hatred for twin as well.On coming home, he finds that Urmila & Lucky are married. He refuses to give them blessings, until Dr.Kedar comes to the scene & explains the whole situation. Now, Bhavani becomes even more furious, but on everybody's insistence, relents. The film ends with a family photo of Mrs.Srivastav, Ratna, Urmila, Ram, Dr.Kedar, Bhavani's sister Kalindi (Shubha Khote) & Bhavani (who is shown without moustache).

评论:

  • 寿鹏鹍 5小时前 :

    剧情一言难尽,歌舞片街头群舞这类型不太欣赏得来,不过体育馆斗舞那一part确实好看

  • 壤驷欣嘉 0小时前 :

    华丽流畅的调度,在颁奖季实属横向碾压,但是《罗密欧与朱丽叶》的故事,一旦拿掉古典背景之后,总觉得过于老套,爱情至上的观念在今时今日的市场中,显得水土不服。

  • 丁梦菲 6小时前 :

    搞不懂斯皮尔伯格为啥要翻拍西区故事,新版比起60年前的老版,不但唱的不行,跳的不行,编剧不行,视效不行,摄剪音不行,服化道不行,而且演员还又丑又笨,据说成本超1亿美元,就为了凸现最后一刻的族裔和解?

  • 宗灿灿 5小时前 :

    2.5 史蒂文·斯皮尔伯格的业务水平肯定是教科书中教科书,他让我对歌舞片的厌烦DNA在看到一小时以后才开始动,歌舞片真的很难拍,按道理来说有得看就应该感恩艺术了。但是这个故事我实在蛋疼。今年奥斯卡尽是改编作品,蚌埠住了,奥斯卡:你们是我带过最差的一届。扭腰贫民窟的地盘争夺战。老史有多会拍男性荷尔蒙,拍爱情就有多像💩,“爱情”=“角色动机”,坠惹。《西区故事之载歌载舞解构阿美丽卡梦点到为止篇》。

  • 元谷槐 3小时前 :

    斯皮其实也尽力了,这种经典翻拍受限的地方太多。新版削弱了舞台感,甚至印象中连歌舞戏的比例还更低了,剧作上没有什么施展空间,那就只能走技术流,镜头、调度、场面都更具大片感。不过,珠玉在前,加上两个主角选得确实不太好,无法超越前作,6.5。

  • 军君丽 6小时前 :

    美国古惑仔的歌舞片糅合了现今最受人唾弃的爱情主线,但都很失败。几乎人人在说史皮堡高超的调度,可能这是唯一的亮点,展现了黄金时代好莱坞的影子。

  • 岚蔚 7小时前 :

    场面调度和摄影都很喜欢,音乐结合舞蹈也十分精彩,只是故事的逻辑多少难以接受,没有代入感。

  • 向晴岚 3小时前 :

    抵不过男女主颜值带来的伤害(对不起不应该颜控)

  • 克初 0小时前 :

    Hhhhhhhhhhhhhh jimmy ouyang 🙏💪👏👍

  • 仕林 6小时前 :

    毫无新意的翻拍之作,配角居然比主演表现的还要好?!真不知道怎么选角的。就这样吧,还不如看它原版。

  • 凭德曜 4小时前 :

    东尼和玛利亚的人物关系变化是说不通的,这也太戏剧了,是因为原作是舞台剧的缘故吗……除此之外,可能我个人对歌舞片没什么鉴赏能力,总是出戏……

  • 强信 3小时前 :

    没有看过老板,直接看的新版。一点开,这色调和画面,背景,也太有时代感了吧。本片是斯导从业几十年来第一次指导歌舞片,但是成片很亮眼,看到近三个小时的时长有点怕,但是看的过程中都没分心。观影过程中,数次让我想起罗朱。移民、治安、教育等,探讨的问题很多,不过也仅仅是点到为止。整个光影、声乐、调度、服装等等都好棒,看得很舒服,看完真的是佩服他美电影工业之发达。

  • 卫云波 7小时前 :

    每一幕都是享受,完美的电影拍摄手法,顶尖的好莱坞水准,来拍摄了一个过时的故事。去享受就好了。

  • 六思美 5小时前 :

    抵不过男女主颜值带来的伤害(对不起不应该颜控)

  • 初钰 1小时前 :

    斯皮尔伯格的功力宝刀未老,几处歌舞场景调度,剪辑拍摄都颇显功力。

  • 俊勇 0小时前 :

    斯皮尔伯格用自己的方式拍出了自己的“摄影机不要停”,这可能是观看本片唯一能被触动的部分了。能看出斯皮尔伯格想把新意思和经典文本、现实环境和舞台质感一网打尽的野心,但最终只止于了一场光影调度教科书,现实场景和舞台文本的结合在开场焕发一点神采之后,逐渐鸡肋,甚至在第二幕之后加剧了原有剧作的陈腐和不可信,除了政治正确上的拨乱反正,几乎没有更多情节或主题上的当代视角和观点,让仓库武斗之后的观感更接近于忍受。选角整体还行,迈克·费斯特的里弗印象最深,但男女主角特别是艾尔高特的木讷扁平演出,取消了作为主线的爱情故事能够打动人的最后可能。相比剧本和呈现,反倒是伯恩斯坦的音乐仍闪耀超出时代的光彩,这也让部分纯配乐段落成为了电影最具张力的部分。三星半

  • 明栀 3小时前 :

    现在才发现罗密欧与朱丽叶有如此现实意义。斯导状态依旧在线,只是剧本太过老气,与先进的拍摄手法多少有点不搭。部分剧情逻辑稍显狗血了,缺乏情感铺垫。现在这种舞台剧式的歌舞片能看到不多了,即更多依靠演员本身的动作和有限的道具交互,而非依靠视觉和听觉上的华丽刺激,这一点还是挺欣赏的。

  • 公孙骏琛 9小时前 :

    搞不懂斯皮尔伯格为啥要翻拍西区故事,新版比起60年前的老版,不但唱的不行,跳的不行,编剧不行,视效不行,摄剪音不行,服化道不行,而且演员还又丑又笨,据说成本超1亿美元,就为了凸现最后一刻的族裔和解?

  • 戏和泽 2小时前 :

    女主居然是吸血鬼日记的女主 保质期太短了吧!

  • 弥依晨 7小时前 :

    America还有体育馆斗舞都拍得很好看!但这个故事本身是不是太有问题了??大概原来的创作者只是想找一个现代载体来改编罗密欧与朱丽叶,波裔移民与白人的矛盾只是制造冲突的引擎,他们不关心塑造出来的角色在这个身份载体上是否合理。不知道当年的观众反应如何,我在2022年看这种故事反正觉得挺不适的。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved