剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 候丹云 8小时前 :

    就各种狰狞面部大特写,高速镜头尴尬体操动作,轮着圈卖关子,反转反转再反转,大音量配乐轰炸,导演像贴着你的耳朵喊,意外吗,意外吗,大哥你意外吗,哈哈哈我都觉得好意外啊。我乏力地醒过来,看着低配的疯狂石头和滑稽戏一样的低俗小说,脑子里只有四个字,没有必要。

  • 后诗翠 3小时前 :

    整体的节奏并不是特别好,但是主角少年青年成年的选角和演技都很好

  • 卫克付 0小时前 :

    中规中矩的黑色幽默悬疑片,剧情进展全靠引入新的角色,带来新的视角,但故事本身并没有太过出彩,每个角色都有种用力过度的感觉,反而不真实

  • 充语梦 4小时前 :

    1)巧合实在太多

  • 仲孙阳曦 0小时前 :

    虽然我还是看哭了,但不算特别好看,剧情过于平铺直叙和太多鸡汤式台词,吴君如的母爱也并不突出,和岁月神偷比真的有距离。不过估计金像奖入围是可以的,拿奖要看对手。最后一星给金jer的片尾曲,能在内地听到mirror的歌曲很感动。

  • 严宏伟 2小时前 :

    执行和完成度很好,但几个点实在喜欢不起来:

  • 卫珲升 3小时前 :

    罗生门式的多视角叙事结构,果然就是要揭示人性的,但真的还不够讽刺,如果结局再黑色一些就更好了,毕竟都能想到“善恶终有报”。但过程里还是有些惊喜的,这点可以肯定。新人导演,看得出有下功夫,但也还是继续加油吧。

  • 婧妍 2小时前 :

    很棒的片子,很感人。只是配音太差了,如果配音更好点可以满分

  • 卫康 3小时前 :

    这种叙事按照个人口味来说,我可能永远也看不腻,李春来越来越有自己的味了,窦骁到片尾才认出来,他会演戏也是没想到,当然我最爱的还是范大爷,这片应该和扬名立万的分数差不多啊

  • 信海 8小时前 :

    电影院的体育题材真是我的太阳能发电机。。故事讲得比较流畅,妈妈真的很辛苦,但是儿子也不一般。跑起来的部分太畅快了!

  • 函靖巧 5小时前 :

    很不错的体育电影,聚焦残疾人运动员完成的很好。

  • 亓官博超 8小时前 :

    三星半水准电影 其实挺惊喜的 得益于创作环境吧 不是传统国产励志片的单纯打鸡血 叙事轻训练困难重社会困难 而且找的演员真是太牛了 但很多桥段还是很尬 真实感还是很欠缺 可能确实没那么多钱吧

  • 仙安然 1小时前 :

    整体处理的还可以,作为导演的处女作来说,非线性叙事加上一点暴风雪山庄,成色上跟《夜·店》差不多,一开始会觉得是彻头彻尾的黑色喜剧,甚至还像在看小品,不过这样的千层饼模式一步步剥开之后才会发现主题是多么的正能量,骇人听闻的拐卖儿童的背后是对人心的探讨,新导演总是有很多想要表达的想法与手法,不过在处理上还是显得稚嫩了些,不过音乐我很喜欢,摄影与画面也可以看出导演的摄影出身,除了手法上欠佳之外还有就是大篇幅的慢镜头看多了就有些审美疲劳,其次这样做感觉太浮夸了

  • 帆媛 6小时前 :

    总之看的时候觉得编剧真是个人才啊!回去关注起来,片尾字幕出来我人傻了导演编剧都是一个人,甚至他还是摄影指导,兼任三职!刘翔导演牛[赞][赞][赞][/cp]

  • 嘉勇 1小时前 :

    剧本肉眼可见的下了大功夫了,情节编排多视角的来回切换,密闭空间的线索铺陈,人物之间的关系梳理。有漏洞但足够扎实了。戏骨不说了,窦骁表演惊喜。

  • 可叶帆 0小时前 :

    看的点映场。影片制作水准上乘,黑色幽默铺底、意外反转不断,惊喜之作!故事很精巧,在封闭空间内写故事本身就很难,为写原创故事的编剧龙也竖大拇指!范伟出色的表演为影片加分不少,想不到另外一个人来演会是什么样子。

  • 公叔千风 1小时前 :

    “金刚川”叙事+花样反转+剧本杀剧本=国产电影新路子?大可不必了整点实在的吧年轻的电影人们!

  • 彩萱 5小时前 :

    对同工同酬的抗争也把观众的视线带到了平时忽视之处。每一块金牌掰开都是血与汗,正常人运动员退役了之后都很难立足,何况是残障人。一次充满了人性光辉的社会性聚焦。

  • 可颖 9小时前 :

    又一部重庆拍摄地的悬疑犯罪片…电影前半段采用更换不同时间线倒叙的手法 把307里真正发生的事情像剥洋葱一样播出来…好人坏人各种变换反转…但每一条时间线都留了恰到好处的伏笔 当观众猜测真相 确实有点像剧本杀的沉浸式体验…眼见真的不一定为实哇~后半段开始正叙 交易那一段又搞笑又紧张的 范伟真的自带喜感…后面救小孩那感觉升华了主题还蛮感动哒…说实话中间那段因为镜头暗示我一度以为外卖员是交易大boss来着 还有最后结局的黑化有点刻意的感觉…顺便表白朱珠!好美身材也爆好!表白摄影 科委立交和筒子楼的俯视角度都拍的好有feel~

  • 兆聪慧 4小时前 :

    香港电影已经这么普普通通了吗?据说因为口碑很好在香港票房非常好,可除了吴君如的演技外,剧本乏善可陈,时间线推进也异常平铺直叙,没有电影的精致感

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved