Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
为啥分这么低？哎我对这种拿歌剧名字做锁的匠人故事真是毫无抵抗力，就喜欢这种超有仪式感的设计，开个巨大金库才拿两包钱怎么了，全部的意义不就是唱完整部剧嘛！好的我要去看活死人军团了！
倒是还能看。开锁佬自导自演，喜剧向带爱情线，用4个传奇保险箱的设定串上<活死人军团>，解释了他后来毫不犹豫join in的动机和理由，最后也在开完“诸神的黄昏”后死在门外。就是有扎导，片长总是不太受控。（女二是<极线杀手>里和拔叔xx的那位）
活死人军团前传。
整体不知道想讲什么，俩女主把人命当儿戏，自己的命也不怎么当回事，也就打戏稍微有点看头
也就一般般而已，没什么大场面，没什么惊心动魄，没什么解密解码，著名的保险柜转几圈就开了。这尼玛是开了外挂吧？也就能将就着看看而已
全片最喜欢开锁的机械声音，听上去太舒适了。
动作戏力量感差了些，却跟片子style很搭调 俩妞儿很可爱很有趣
挺好的。这是还有续集的路子啊。镜头很有特点，剪辑也很棒。弱在剧情上了。
感觉比正传好看，人物的细节刻画，情感都通过各种剧情的链接变得丰满，另外太女主好看了
硬要往丧尸片上靠，这种蹭热度的感觉就没什么诚意。四个保险箱倒是一开始介绍的神乎其神，后面轻松被破。我很认可一个观点，一部优秀的作品不是靠开头旁边介绍设定的，而是靠细节，比如沙丘。 简单的爽片而已
P.S.男主抱着两个罐子拍全家福真是心酸又好好笑😂😂😂
活死人军团起码还能看看特效，这部偷盗片真的是一点高潮都没。
很是无聊 平淡 听片名感觉很有意思很是刺激又聪明的一个团队 然后完成一个大爽片 但其实很无聊 平淡
说实话，在网站看到电影封面我还以为是莉可丽丝的真人版，结果正片却是连个杀手妹子的插科打诨日常，从二人组到小黑帮一众人一进女仆咖啡厅整个画风就变得奇怪起来，配上一本正经的从头到尾搞中二，真实比较小日子的懒洋洋风格呢，六分，消磨时间
倒是还能看。开锁佬自导自演，喜剧向带爱情线，用4个传奇保险箱的设定串上<活死人军团>，解释了他后来毫不犹豫join in的动机和理由，最后也在开完“诸神的黄昏”后死在门外。就是有扎导，片长总是不太受控。（女二是<极线杀手>里和拔叔xx的那位）
看过活死人军团的可以一看这一部前传，新意还是有的，但总体上是一部普通的网络电影。
反差萌，杀人杀出了一种微风起涟漪的感觉，好冷、好平淡。黑道、女仆咖啡厅。
大概是国外的网大？3D效果和音效其实挺带感，只不过千篇一律的密码形式和解密形式让人看得很无聊，僵尸等元素也没有实际意义，动机故事非常敷衍
还行呢。。。
不理解为啥活死人这个样子还要开发什么丧尸宇宙乱七八糟的是不是钱没地方花啊？就拍拍女主女配一起招摇撞骗前传好吧 不比什么臭男人装逼强太多 男主实属给我整笑了不明白这种蠢货呆子人设为什么会存在啊
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
