A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
4 途中一度以为会搞百合，谁知道笔锋一转这谁能想到啊？！
我想看的：和序、破一样精彩的机器人vs神性怪物的打戏，“X亿玉碎总体战”一样的集举国之力的决战氛围，将EVA以如同奥特曼般巨大而沉重的巨物进行刻画，带有二次元特有的扭曲大透视镜头和形变的作画。
最后面把老子看哭了都。万友信我，千万不要带对象一起看，毒性太大。我也要吸取教训，就算已经结婚了也要尽力做好自己，继续喜欢我老伴。
EVA看着我的人生走过了快30年的时间，此刻它终于要和我永别了，我真的要跟庵野秀明深深地鞠一躬，郑重地说上一句谢谢。这些年里，EVA就像父母之外的第三个陪伴者，甚至在我最困窘的今天，它用最温柔的方式给了我最后的教导，谢谢你，我会做一个好的大人。
丽输了。丽被牺牲了。
aromantic视角的胡说八道：要破除soulmate的迷思，只要意识到自己并没有多特别，一些自认为奇怪的想法和兴趣，其实很多人也是这么想的（所以那种遇到soulmate的欣喜本质上还是自恋 ？）；兴趣一致的人还是做朋友比较好，万一失去共同语言了自然会drift apart，不需要分手仪式……以及日本影视剧中好像真的很喜欢“眼看着别人走进你刚踩过的坑”这种桥段……
三无女神掰直国民基佬
真拍不出来了就把真心为你再拍一遍不好么？这事痞子又不是没干过。
爱上自己的翻版所以爱的还是自己，只是爱自己又怎么会一起成长。因为工作产生的变化像是没在普通公司工作过的人想象出来的，他爸要是肯继续养着他两个人是不是就幸福下去了。想当然的故事和发展拍得好像真情实感也算是厉害吧，可惜我实在没法对菅田将晖这个脸产生真情实感。
最后想说一句，我们什么时候才能拍出这样的爱情片。。。
连真嗣都长大了，这次真的是所有人最完美的补完，再见了，所有的eva。
超越幻想并不那么容易，这些创伤（包含渚薰的牺牲）对真嗣而言是难以整合到自身的符号体系当中的，这种画了横杠了的主体在那个幻想的菱形当中困苦不堪，这种痛苦，是没有办法凭借香那种咄咄逼人的激将法来抹平的；黑凌波以一种前符号的婴孩姿态切入了后天启时代的田园牧歌。碇就对补完的痴迷这一心理情景给出了一个简单易懂的回答：一种世纪末的忧郁症。老人（豪猪/司令）已经无可救药地陷在了这套弃绝主义的意识形态当中。后启示录时代让生存论获得了直接的、跨越阶层的新变化，让畏（dread）在主体和绝对者之间进行中介与调和，也就是说，必须要将主体的原初体验作为本真，以一个个无可逃避的死亡一般的抉择来中介这个分裂对抗的世界，而不是滑向多愁善感的情绪主义。忧郁症总会有淡漠消逝的那天。痞子这番操作，大约能管中窥豹地看见一种成熟。
2、明日香一個普通人為什麼有克隆人？克隆來幹嘛？明日香是eoe中個人意識最強的人，到最後都拒絕補完，為什麼要設定為克隆人？
学生心态的恋爱为什么要结束啊，那样纯粹的爱多动人，两个人一起文艺地生活与爱好戳我。柴米油盐的爱情也动人，或许故事有后来，或许生活就这样，总之爱过这样的人就不辜负爱情。
软色情严重，剧情拖沓，原速看了半小时忍不住开2倍速了，要不是字幕看不过来我巴不得4倍速。好歹也曾经中二过，EVA以这样落幕我不接受。庵野秀明太垃圾，这tm跟EVA原作有半毛钱关系？？？？两星给情怀。
我将永远记得这几天对我来说漫圈史诗级的梦幻联动
After so many years later, shit i still lv u ~
如果村花追求的是偶然共鸣的精神生活，或许苏打最后走向的是具体的生活形式。而我现在终于觉得后者不比前者不重要了。
没有钱就不能看电影和买书，忙着赚钱就没有精力看电影和看书，浪漫的自己就被生活杀死了
去年漏看了这部，却等来了大银幕，简直为豆瓣文青量身打造，很久没看过这么细腻动人的爱情电影了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
