A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
没有结构。也没有呈现变化。没有想法。
什么是青春，青春就是燃烧自己，她们那一刻就是，热情并没有被雨水浇灭。电影有一个有趣的设定是，学校发觉二人的亲密关系，找来了双方的家长谈话，父亲与父亲一见面先是问对方高就，再然后即说女孩子之间这么玩在一起没什么，他们觉得学校太夸张，这一点很有意思，以“接受”的态度来不承认这段关系的定义，随着时间流逝人事变幻，这个问题也成为了女主角心里的问题，这也是电影没有做得很好的一点。
以及我不理解为什么要在女同性恋纯爱情片中加莫名其妙的男性角色、结尾为什么be我get不到逻辑。😅
只能说不愧是GUCCI，第一吐槽点居然是“太丑”
谈善言在同辈演员中已经出类拔萃许久，杨偲泳这次表现亮眼，温柔又坚定，调皮又成熟。两位女演员几场感情冲突的戏份，都很令人动容，最后互表心意的结尾看哭了。
看到预告片时有一些期待，看完电影后个人觉得评分还是比较客观的，太多太零散的情节和滤镜都有种过犹不及的感觉。不太能理解两人定下了30岁之约，又各过各的，一起努力不好么？
Gaga真的是看点，感觉可以拍成一个mini剧集
只能说不愧是GUCCI，第一吐槽点居然是“太丑”
麦家琪、童爱玲两位女神的出现，可算是这部电影的最大彩蛋了。
难受住了
唉，真系烦sei，就算听得明也某用，有字幕就好勒，你俩架葛感情我真系搞唔明。
我见过这样的女人，以为只要掌控了男人就能得到自己想要的一切。嫁入豪门是一场豪赌，自己就是最好的赌注。
现在的同性青春片啊，为了爱情弄得翻天覆地撕心裂肺互相折磨，着实让观众很难引起共鸣，细腻朦胧美不好吗。这两个演员的面相也不适合演高中生。
这个电影好像没有讲什么情节，可就是让我沉浸其中。心怀愧疚，存有亏欠的那个人，最终迟迟无法释怀。当初被“伤害”的人最早放下。
只想说2022年了……拍一部没有男人和父权视角强奸的纯les片真的不犯法哈。
其实没那么糟糕，不过你得对名导有要求。司机黑化的逻辑没拍出来，以至于雷导这回遮遮掩掩的女性主义更像是无病呻吟了。
麦家琪、童爱玲两位女神的出现，可算是这部电影的最大彩蛋了。
角色的念白与故事的走向都显得有点幼稚肤浅，但依然是充满意义的亮相；而刻意打光做旧的气质让人有几分沉迷，也似乎和她们的青春、激情与疯狂永远留在了那场大雨里- -就像每个创造了“现象性”的同影，总会有那么一个时刻，这里就是那场雨。背景交代的是Eason拿下叱咤金奖的千禧年，但我却穿越回梦剧院还在活跃的年代- -那么的远，又那么的熟悉。
这段感情发生在2001-2003年期间。为什么给5星？因为这片真的是很真实，因为我经历过这些。那个年代说远不远，说近不近，但又有谁能在那个时候挺身出柜？说到李芯悦为什么会在结婚的时候邀请李咏蓝当伴娘，大概还是一歌词“能成为密友 大概总带着爱”。李芯悦曾经勇敢过，是李咏蓝错过了，错过就是错过了，因为还带着爱，想让你看着我结婚，也就好像婚礼是我和你的婚礼一样（李芯悦在说我愿意之前，有含泪笑着看向李咏蓝）。ps：自我感觉英文翻译和粤语差别真的比较大，也有可能看不懂英语，听得懂粤语吧。以上观点仅为个人观点，自己都有自己的看法，总归，值得看。（抠细节，有谁看到了最后婚礼上，芯悦把戒指给咏蓝戴上了）
以及我不理解为什么要在女同性恋纯爱情片中加莫名其妙的男性角色、结尾为什么be我get不到逻辑。😅
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
