A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
尤尼克斯大bug倒是真真没想到的反转。有了野心的机器人也就和人接近了，而人的特色就是会犯错啊。
那個，豆B你刪了我的評論，多謝你😊11106
3.5还是很热内，但理解的新技术和机器人还是很轻飘飘的。人类确实会犯错，会不履行诺言，但人类会幽默。本来其实很坚定三星的，但最后一小段迷之打动我。以及：非常想要那个打扫机器人。
看完第一感受，剧情矛盾太不合理，家务机器人为了保护主角而把他们关起来，主角则完全无视外面的危险一心想逃出去。就算人工智能要造反，对付你家里这几个家用机器人不比对付外面的军用机器人简单？•᷄ࡇ•᷅
让热内标志性的美术设计贯穿始终，有趣又养眼
让导典型的《天使爱美丽》式的高色彩饱和度，一出荒诞剧。
这种表达方式让人心生厌烦，看着特别累，很难跟着入戏，也没心情去理解导演想表达的东西了
脑洞大开，家居机器人想成为真正人类，还拯救了人类。有笑点，还带着些法式浪漫。影片的色彩搭配，人物造型，观感也挺好。
该片的“丧”别具魅力，不仅不会令人感到压抑，反而会让人觉得释放，就像在嘈杂的城市生活中经历了一次心灵洗涤。
这种表达方式让人心生厌烦，看着特别累，很难跟着入戏，也没心情去理解导演想表达的东西了
别贴姬片标签了因为根本就不是。滨边美波有时候像长泽雅美有时候像韩素希
比最近的漂亮国片子好太多了。到处都是对资本的控诉，但也有人像詹妮弗那样热衷迎接资本的蜜糖（就是脑子不太好使那种）。资本冷酷无情的逻辑和理性最后玩死了自己，人们又回归家庭和人性的温暖。机器人只是表层，就像现在的算法，他们永远在模仿，而不知道自己在模仿什么。导演还是把机器人拟人化了，按照他们的思维是不可能希望变成人的，完全没有这种意图，变成人类也没好处，所以是无所谓的。导演只是借用机器人来表现资本的贪婪和无情而已。在电影这个夕阳产业，不退步已经是最大的进步了，还有人在那逼逼赖赖，也不看看其他片已经烂成什么样了，呵呵
三星半 有点拖又不够厚重，不知道哪里出了问题呢
非常好看，非常有趣的法国电影，特别的幽默，特别浪漫。
面部识别灭了自己哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈
“高中生尤雷克是这桩命案的唯一目击者，他就此成为专制政权的头号敌人，从特勤局、媒体到法院都成为国家打压他和亲友的工具。”简介可以
到尤尼克斯们围攻那一家的时候我都觉得还行，然后把bigbug丢给尤尼克斯内部自己杀自己，最后……不过bigbug也可能指那些认为自己是人类的人工智能，但最后那一下真把我整懵了、庄周梦蝶挺喜欢的hhh
故事拍得七零八落，但取景和构图实在太美好了，所以算了，原谅你啦～
3.5 剧本扎实情绪密集的波兰学院派，向观众抛出了一团关于权力与暴力如何在媾和中消灭正义与公平、体制如何肆无忌惮施压去磨灭个体的精神与诉求、犬儒如何成为帮凶去隐瞒和篡改良心的黑暗世界。在记录历史和启示现实上这种激烈的纪实有一定作用，当然作为电影，它的揭露沉重得太密不透风，并没有留给观者一个喘息的出口。
一开始还以为是爱死机真人版，但很快发现还是一出披着科幻外衣的法式théâtre
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
