A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
角度是刁的，林克莱特是惯性好评的，然而现在我这种重口味，是觉得这故事交给屎尿屁团队去拍会更喜闻乐见一些。
林克莱特的私人回忆录，依然是导演拿手的青少年视角，比大多数拍情怀自传片的导演好多了，完全不油腻。可惜选用转制动画片的形式，更easy，同时也平面化许多，难以产生共鸣。表白下杰克·布莱克的旁白，很适合也很抓耳。
六十年代的美国风土人情和人类首次次登月的豪情跃然屏幕，怀旧和青春励志完美的融和在一起，还是卡通片，非常值得一看。
这部电影看了之后很感动，男主作为支教老师把自己的一生都奉献给了支教，在藏区和藏区人民一起生活，藏区的孩子们也很淳朴可爱，剧中有多处催泪的地方，拍的很真实，值得大家去看
我们不一定是历史的亲历者，却一定是历史的见证者。无论是以什么样的方式亲历或见证，重大历史事件中的个人情绪、家庭故事和集体记忆，一定比官方历史书写更为丰富生动，以及真实。虽是上世纪六十年代美国少年的梦想和记忆，许多看来也跟我们不无重叠。越南战争、美苏冷战、太空争霸、反黑人种族歧视运动、嬉皮士运动等大型社会变革的爆发；电视、电影、电话、唱片等媒介的兴起；甚至是音乐、时装、广告等时尚与流行文化浪潮的席卷，跟中国八零后的记忆几乎同构。CG技术的运用也让这场心灵冒险显得十分真实。
用一個幻想去包童年往事，最好看也是那些生活細節，覺得做得最好就是沒有要解開那個幻想，沒有要用劇情去完成它，而是輕輕讓他跟真實合而為一成了電影。
亦真亦假的动画效果，借着登月，把70年代到80年代的美国社会景象勾勒到位，有很多地方也勾起了我这个80后的童年回忆，现在我们这群人已经是中年或者中老年了，虽然下一辈并不在乎这群人经历过的，但对这群人来说，互联网之前的社会有它不可复刻的丰富和人情味。
大量的旁白碎语，充满着导演对于童年的回忆，对60年代的美国的回忆。
嬉皮士，动画片，音乐，电影，爸爸妈妈奶奶，兄弟姐妹们，老师同学。。。
充满了童趣，美国人会很有共鸣吧？关于那个时代。
中国人已经太久没能体验多子女家庭的欢乐了，不如把三线以下城市做的特别宜居没有压力，然后让大家自由自在的生吧。
儿童视角穿梭在属于他的时代，与其说是太空故事，其实就是少年对自己童年的追忆。
林克莱特的少年时代，基本也是一部爱国主义教育史，无处不在的国歌和国旗飘荡，还有够吹上一百年的登月计划。没啥新鲜的，对他父母居家过日子的简朴劲儿挺共情，还有画面也相当惊艳。7
全是充满温馨的回忆与感动。
能做到像男女主这样无私奉献的人真的少之又少，可是不明白，为什么到最后小学都已经那么好了，男主还是没能跟女主买一件像样的衣服呢
比较中规中矩吧，没有特别出彩也没有特别拉胯，立意是好的，最后还升华了一下。
男主最开始就是因为梅朵唱歌喜欢上的她，最后男主离开时梅朵也是唱这首歌，首尾呼应，故事情节很完整。
太逗了！好多地方笑出猪叫！！！旁白+画面抖机灵节奏都好妙。超级美国60-70年代 超级德州 有些东西德州郊区生活现在也没变 比如皮卡后面坐一群teenager吃吃喝喝 比如爸爸教育孩子red neck和white trash的区别
小朋友的记忆亦幻亦真让人有些迷糊，但他们那一代美国人的生活经历真是异常丰富精彩。
Love the interwoven perspective and nostalgia
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
