Umberto Lenzi is undoubtedly the king of Italian crime movies, but unfortunately; Syndicate Sadists is not the best examples of his work in this genre. Lenzi's crime flicks tend to be a cut above the rest because he makes films based on stories with a point, and they don't lack direction; but this film feels a bit too wayward to fully fit with the rest of his stuff. The film takes obvious influence from Sergio Leone's landmark western 'A Fistful of Dollars' (which in turn, took influence from Akira Kurosawa's landmark samurai flick Yojimbo), in that it features two warring families and a strong character at the centre. The crime that Lenzi focuses on is kidnapping, and we centre on a character called 'Rambo'. Rambo is dragged into the war between the two families after his brother is killed because of it. Rambo uses his brains and brawn to pit the two families against one another, in the hope of gaining revenge for his brother's death, rescuing a young boy that they've kidnapped, and ultimately letting the two sides destroy one another.
The film's biggest asset is undoubtedly Tomas Milian. Milian was put to great use by Lenzi in almost all of his crime thrillers. The range of characters he has played for Lenzi is immense, and this one is easily one of the coolest. The character is called Rambo, which immediately sprang to mind the popular Sylvester Stallone character - but for once, the Italians actually haven't stolen this name as Syndicate Sadists was released first! As usual, the film is wickedly entertaining, as we get to watch Milian get himself involved in the usual array of car chases, shootouts and brawls. Lenzi has got him riding a motorbike this time round, and every scene featuring it and Milian is a real standout! However, the film often feels like it doesn't really have anywhere to go, and this means that the running time is stretched out more than it should be. Compared to the crime films of other Italian directors, Syndicate Sadists is more than above average; but in relation to Lenzi crime flicks such as Almost Human and The Cynic, The Rat and The Fist - it doesn't stand tall as one of Lenzi's best. Still, if you're looking for ninety minutes of testosterone fuelled mayhem - Syndicate Sadists will suffice!
6/10。故事讲得太浅了，以至于像是纯粹呈现了一位女性意外怀孕，为了学业而不择手段堕胎的故事。但女主说她得了一种只有女性才会得的病，加上影片的背景设置在1960年代，显然想引入对女性意识的探讨。
被告知怀孕后的冷静，到图书馆查阅性书籍，花20法郎仿佛抓住救命稻草般所注射的雌二醇，一个人在房间幽暗的灯光下用烧灼后的细钢针直刺入下体，她没有足够的性常识、当面临着比地狱还糟糕的情况，她孤立无援，无法求助母亲、密友和那个让她怀孕的人。三次对身体的破坏，每一次都让痛感冲出银幕。我想到了《钛》，这个故事将背景设置在1960年代，年轻人对性的憧憬和欲望，女性对自身性吸引力的灌注，却让女性成为这一切没有错的原始欲望所造成的结果的全部承受者！更可怕的是畸形的法律、始终置身事外的精子提供者！那些身体上的疼痛，直到今天仍在书写。“正发生”
Walked out when she tries to abort with a fucking stick ...
如此政治的topic之下是对个人经历最诚恳的叙述，但happening的标题以后半段无比生猛的表现力又令观众很难不去联想到许多女性遇到的共同困境，更表现出第二波女权运动的口号“个人的即政治的”这一口号
这片子应该让那些平时很便宜、很随便的青年男女们当成课程学习一下，一时爽会带来多么痛苦的下场。
8.5/10
一个青少年的心理抗争路程，痛苦与孤独并存！
被当头棒喝。生老病死，才发现“生”明明如此重要，但是被好好讨论得太少了。女性在生中扮演如此重要的角色，这一切过程却在漫长的历史乃至今日一直被模糊、被忽视、被不详化，连我作为女性本身也对此一知半解，也许正是因为真相过于骇人和沉重吧。
我的身体，我怎样才能保护。这样的道理，不应该只有我懂。
与NRSA相似的浅焦+特写 角色都处于长焦镜头下逼仄的空间之中 但相比之下Hittman镜头下的空间更加开放 有着存在感更强烈的环境背景和城市空间 而这部则几乎完全局限于角色的平面 面孔与面孔周围 情绪封闭在4:3的方块之中 而观看则是一个沉浸并共情的过程 性别的障碍被打破 HER pain 同时这种手法也抽离了时代背景 聚光灯打在角色一人身上 背后的布景处于阴影之中 尽管设定于上世纪的法国 但她也完全可以身处于任何一个年代 任何一处地方 而这一切也可以是“正发生” 而非仅仅停留在“发生过” 比NRSA更狭隘的空间也是因为Anne的处境相比Autumn来说更加的无助 相比整个国家法律的禁止 travel to NY似乎还是个简单的方式 我们永远需要这样的female voice
去看《正发生》，你才能明白罗诉韦德案被推翻意味着什么。
因為歐洲的藝術電影描繪的東西總是和現實太像了，所以那種在課堂上被老師點名回答問題的緊張，舞會想要穿的漂亮吸引眼球卻又怕流言的糾結，所謂“好學生”就不應該有性慾望的束縛，所有青春共情的痛點全部在熒幕上展現出來。
所有此类题材，目前还是没有一部能超越《四月三周两天》。
"What do I label her?" "Miscarriage."
这中间的一切成为一段秘闻
还好最后小静没有事
B+ #CIBEMABIA# 电影以1.37:1的旧电视格式呈现，缩小了视野，并赋予故事真实性和生活感，Anne的怀孕周期随着时间的推移如同定时炸弹一样不断揪着观众的心，她试图阻止，并付出了代价。出彩的剪辑，使一系列景深和定焦的连贯镜头变得生动，特写镜头则密切地关注着安妮怀孕的身体、心理变化，捕捉这一过程并且赤裸裸的呈现出来，与Never不同的是，它全程都是冷冰冰的。我们大多数人做出的选择通常与社会接受度相符，但我们仍然希望在坚持自我后，被拥抱与接受，即使在精神上拒绝承认这一点，正如片名《正发生》，类似的事会将一直在我们身边上演，禁止不了的是人类的生理结构，而退一万步，社会能做的就只有接纳与照顾，但听闻德州实行的堕胎禁令，让人不禁想问，社会是否正在倒退？
3.5 又是女人之苦(血腥 小女孩心态变化抓得挺好
取巧的议题，电影本身没有什么亮点。凭什么击败犬之力拿下金狮啊？我不理解=_=
很难想象是金狮奖的片子，手段和内容都毫无新意，中规中矩稳扎稳打。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
