Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
世界上有很多不得不上路的人，人们觉得他们无家可归，但在他们心里，四海皆为家。敬这些人的勇敢，真挚和心怀自由。
两个字：自然。影片的主要元素很美国，房车、公路、营地、流浪等等。但和那些为了反叛或逃避的文青式“在路上”不同，主角的流浪很自然，这就是她的生活本身，尽管她有她的落魄和孤独，但并不可怜。正如她和小女孩说的，她是houseless，而不是homeless
为了宽阔的草原
秀雅风姿将永远翩翩
慢慢的成纪录片式的展开美国中西部的普通人故事。我也是从一个矿业小镇出来的，如今很久没有回去了。
我还以为是美国本地人拍的，拍出了失产者的困境昔日的第一大国的困境，但又不死心地想要为这种现状去开脱，为了追求精神境界啦不是因为没钱被困住了而是因为精神上被困住了啦……巴拉巴拉，但这或许也是现状的一种表现吧。
无依之地的fern才真正的活着
重点是事件驱动而抛弃时间上的连贯动感，以一粒粒个体的事件折射这个群体生存状态，将角色置于广角大背景下，无视叙事连贯使得感受更加流动，其实还蛮不喜欢这片的配乐，似乎增加了一丝不真实感，把我从这个故事里更加抽离出来无法浸入
see you down the road 那个是真的 nomad 在车里生活十九年了。
但它又被不断地推着推着，总有一天要上路。人类文明的历史里，路从来都是一段过程，是从一处连接向另一处的“间在”；而总有一部分人群，他们生活在路上，也因而，生活在一段“不存在”中。
时代凋敝，个人丧失，看着有点后嬉皮，骨子里却还是great again的cliche。钢琴铺得太满，风光剪辑倒不错——有一段连同配乐刹得挺有灵气。不起用名演员或许更好。 /// 听了波米的播客，才知后面本是本批判向的纪实作品，却被处理得不痛不痒那就7-1=6了
你以为是没有目标而选择居无定所，但事实可能恰恰相反。一个人在内心真的需要某种支撑，哪怕是一种执念，也能指引你方向。当能找到生活里的那种很具象的意义所在时，就能收获一些觉得“死而无憾”这样的时刻。这样的时候可能可以多一些，因为它们无疑就代表着幸福。
随着女主慢慢的进入了她的生活，感受了她的情绪，最后理解了她的人生。
观感上比《骑士》好很多，更多的是对情绪和状态的表达。
越被吹捧厉害的剧情片，反而愈来愈生出一股逆反心理不愿和大家一窝蜂去看去评价，也愈来愈只在乎自己感受。搁了很久，最后老头子聊到在路上原因稍感动容，能感受到导演想营造的调调，但整体看来并非很喜欢
时代之殇，人如何和丧失共处？
内敛而忧伤。配上宁静忧郁的音乐，想着如果相同的故事也在中国西部上演。。。
随便拿张地图看看吧：一块区域的地理范围是面，是广延的；地理建筑或地标则是由点构成，是紧缩的锚。路呢？它们只是“线”。
配乐太拉垮了。私以为最后一个镜头如果不要那辆车会更好。剪辑真棒，有得学。
“水无形而有形,无物而容万物”——水作为传统的女性性别符号，尤其是东方女性，象征着协调、温润、灵动、没有棱角、却充满着韧性和力量、也从不停歇。在这部电影里，无论是影像风格、内容、主角性格都体现着这一点。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
