Umberto Lenzi is undoubtedly the king of Italian crime movies, but unfortunately; Syndicate Sadists is not the best examples of his work in this genre. Lenzi's crime flicks tend to be a cut above the rest because he makes films based on stories with a point, and they don't lack direction; but this film feels a bit too wayward to fully fit with the rest of his stuff. The film takes obvious influence from Sergio Leone's landmark western 'A Fistful of Dollars' (which in turn, took influence from Akira Kurosawa's landmark samurai flick Yojimbo), in that it features two warring families and a strong character at the centre. The crime that Lenzi focuses on is kidnapping, and we centre on a character called 'Rambo'. Rambo is dragged into the war between the two families after his brother is killed because of it. Rambo uses his brains and brawn to pit the two families against one another, in the hope of gaining revenge for his brother's death, rescuing a young boy that they've kidnapped, and ultimately letting the two sides destroy one another.
The film's biggest asset is undoubtedly Tomas Milian. Milian was put to great use by Lenzi in almost all of his crime thrillers. The range of characters he has played for Lenzi is immense, and this one is easily one of the coolest. The character is called Rambo, which immediately sprang to mind the popular Sylvester Stallone character - but for once, the Italians actually haven't stolen this name as Syndicate Sadists was released first! As usual, the film is wickedly entertaining, as we get to watch Milian get himself involved in the usual array of car chases, shootouts and brawls. Lenzi has got him riding a motorbike this time round, and every scene featuring it and Milian is a real standout! However, the film often feels like it doesn't really have anywhere to go, and this means that the running time is stretched out more than it should be. Compared to the crime films of other Italian directors, Syndicate Sadists is more than above average; but in relation to Lenzi crime flicks such as Almost Human and The Cynic, The Rat and The Fist - it doesn't stand tall as one of Lenzi's best. Still, if you're looking for ninety minutes of testosterone fuelled mayhem - Syndicate Sadists will suffice!
纹身时看了一半，回家看完另一边，怎么说呢，自己飘了，我怎么感觉这水平我也能拍出来（不是）……拉踩——同题作文我还是宁愿去看肯洛奇
喜欢。看完理解了这个片名。过度解读会变得无聊，只是看，就好了。想学车了，需要有一段这样真正自由的人生
与大部分人不同，Fern一段时间后选择自我放逐，过着类似牛仔又类似现代吉普赛人的生活。这不仅因为永不落下的星条旗背后有一群人正日渐消逝，更源于世上再无人可分享人生之最大悲剧。
如果一个人每天都在自残，拒绝善意，又要融入社会，却无法跟自己和解。这样的电影，即便镜头很美，配乐舒缓，看完又能感受到什么呢，意义呢？很多人都在跟海边的曼彻斯特做对比。从我个人的灼见来讲，剧情的发展，情感的张力，和人物的内心成长，都不可相提并论。同样是无法和过去和解，曼彻斯特跟人的力量非常强大，男主其实还是得到了救赎；但无依之地最后回到离开的地方，画了一个圆而已。所以中间整个电影就是导演沉醉于自我抛弃的一种美的表达吗？两星给演技。
抽烟、清洁、拉撒、裸泳：持续全片的琐碎画面拼凑起一位怀念亡夫的倔强中年女性的流浪人生。感觉就是结合了麦姨各种硬气姿态和美国山区风光的大型MV（还真的literally有生命之树啊），全程仓促地从一个片段跳到下一个片段，没有积蓄，无法共情。回妹妹家和去相好家的两段很无力，因为Fern的态度明摆在那里，最终的选择毫无悬念。从《骑士》到这部，我觉得赵婷退了一大步。
We all die alone, but it's ok, cuz I'll see you down the road, dad.
勉强两分。看睡着了。本片的女性表达，在深度和形式上，相比同样得了金狮的《天涯沦落女》或是只拿到提名的《奥兰多》都是种倒退（这些片子都含有依托时空转换揭晓女性禀赋与环境对冲的动机）。这电影基本是科恩嫂一直游荡各地打短工、跟朋友闲聊、保持自身独立这些内容的循环，它没有主线，也谈不上有什么剧情，台词大部分都是片汤话，角色状态没起伏，色调清冷压抑，科恩嫂跟老头讲自己活在回忆里算是直接点题了，但这老头是谁？科恩嫂为什么对他说这些？明明全片去戏剧化，又用这种生硬的方式点题，显得编导能力的可笑了。本片也有些许编制&解构又一部依托公路的美国神话的成分，比如电影里出现了多次关于各种石头的设计，表示女主角因经济问题不得不上路的同时，还有石头所代表的永恒价值，这主题并不稀奇，况且科恩嫂的表演方式容易让人感到她偏执
老年版into the wild，北欧滤镜一加可以说和美国毫无关系，80%的对话毫无意义。 期望越大，失望越大。
影像技术非常好，但是对故事重心走向感到失望，我不能满意呈现出超大型资本世界下零工生活、和被宛如火山灰覆盖的废旧工厂同时，出于对个人悲辛叙事的着迷，把原子化的老年困境拍成带上一层田园牧歌滤镜的选择。不过看到科恩嫂在清泉中裸体平躺独对天地，看到与性无关的衰老女性身体，清洁，一无所有，对那种孤独有所触动，在那一幕流下眼泪。
过高期待让实际体验打折扣。支持亚裔女导演和女性主导影片，但感到全满贯奖项仍有政治正确的成分。奥斯卡一向喜欢的那种流畅的主旋律电影，看似内敛克制实际处处精心安排，受威尼斯宠爱也不意外。剧本主导型，并不算新鲜的社会失语群体刻画，承袭西部传统的公路片，各家前辈的影响痕迹，标准美式独立电影风格，让观影过程处处有déjà-vu感。更期待能有更加个人的表达。
太抒情了额。风景太美了人太白了戳不中痛点。隔靴搔痒还要留下一线希望实在不必。不如《天涯沦落女》。
前一个小时是无奈，孤独，固执。
勘破三春景不长,绍衣顿改昔年妆。
恭喜赵婷，亚裔的骄傲，让蛆虫继续气急败坏在大洋彼岸辱骂你吧!而你所要做的就是继续做自己，创造属于亚裔的辉煌。
上映周数：6周
首周末票房：50万
才知道宋丹丹是赵婷的继母…
无依之地无依之地无依之地无依之地
电影讲述的是那些被生活抛弃的人们如何更积极的去拥抱生活的故事。因为总有晚霞出现在旷野的尽头，所以便要一直追寻。
Nomadland是一部关于自然和生命的影片，它从影像到文字都在描述美国这片广袤多元，令人痴迷又敬畏的土地。它既不是在控诉社会的冷酷，也不是在歌颂游民生活的浪漫。它仅仅是通过一些微小的片段让我们得以思考一些重要的问题，没有人有答案，也不需要有答案。赵婷从一个旁观者的角度真正展现了一个最美国的美国。我们听Fern不断地背诵莎士比亚，不得不想到——是什么让欧洲人成为了美国人？欧洲人来到美国，他们一开始就是游民，这片土地塑造了他们，使他们变成美国人，可多年后美国变得比欧洲人有过之而无不及地以金钱和阶级划分人生等级，而游民又一次成了“古怪而可悲”的
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
