Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
慢动作大特写不要钱，电视剧一样的套路拍法，充满陈辞滥调的俩小时。映后有位演员到场，主持人只是让演员聊了几句没让大家提问，今晚最大的慈悲。
同样是改编翻拍，《误杀2》在剧情上选择了一个全新的故事，但一样展现了社会底层人物的挣扎，一个父亲为了救自己的孩子想尽各种办法，甚至不惜劫持医院与公权力抗争，同类型现实题材影片很难做到这一尺度。在亲情体现上也没有刻意煽情，更多的是对现实的思考。影片在悬疑感的营造上也延续了前作的一再反转，但是在某种程度上更抓人。
小孩子移植的是心脏，就算是成人的，也完美匹配；
中间男主的反叛莫名其妙，让人摸不着头脑。电影不是揭露黑暗就能得高分。
假装在泰国系列，如果继续是翻拍的话其实翻得还算合格过瘾，改天有空补起原版，想想咱们强国就无法大大方方地多产产这类商业片，而要一再拿来，都对周边小国类型片审美疲劳了要，配乐音效算优秀加一星，文咏珊演技太烂了又减一星，彩蛋可还行，假设彩蛋为真，那这位父亲确实应该转行别再当编剧了。真正的黑暗根本让人看不见，还是泰naive.
同样是12月17号上，北美看蜘蛛侠3，中国人看误杀2。我只想说，陈思诚牛逼。
给两星确实稍低，但也是片方“招摇撞骗”的结果。这跟之前的误杀完全不是一种东西。2021年了，这种剧情一点悬念都没有，连随便一条社会新闻的力量都不够，电影还在那里自我感动，用了很多自以为张力拉满的慢镜头、特写、一惊一乍剪辑、刺耳噪音声效。全程无法共情，人物就突出一个功能性，这不是误杀，这是自杀，一个悲哀的故事。总结：没有必要拍出来。
太搞笑了，他儿子的病本来就是心脏太大了，结果给换了个更大的。但是因为是父爱主题，又不忍心给一星……无语，被拿捏了
对于国产片来说，情节紧凑，故事讲得通已是难得，不明白为什么分数如此低。蝼蚁一样的人，也敢对抗统治者，让人敬佩。
摸着良心问问这部电影不值得五星吗？这么低的评分，是讲到韭菜们的痛楚了吗？
《爱情神话》那么好笑，却意外也难过。
打俩星是我最后的仁慈！千万不要去电影院看啊！它不配！
老老实实直接照搬《迫在眉睫》就得了，非得取其精华去其糟粕是吧？
假装在泰国系列，如果继续是翻拍的话其实翻得还算合格过瘾，改天有空补起原版，想想咱们强国就无法大大方方地多产产这类商业片，而要一再拿来，都对周边小国类型片审美疲劳了要，配乐音效算优秀加一星，文咏珊演技太烂了又减一星，彩蛋可还行，假设彩蛋为真，那这位父亲确实应该转行别再当编剧了。真正的黑暗根本让人看不见，还是泰naive.
-普通人干不多资本，普通人干不多资本，需要恒久的坚持！
迫在眉梢 John Q (2002)，汉化版？
祝韩国电影越来越好吧
韩国电影永远是敢拍，敢想，演员能很入戏，但是就是现实就是永远不改！！
怎么电影里全在写疯狂爱儿子的父亲，现实里全是抛妻弃子的爸爸？是越缺什么越要强调什么吗……虽然文咏珊演的不好，但也别再把美人配给胖大叔了行不行，眼睛睁一睁，真的很不搭！！【这改编的就是没上一部完全照抄的好看呢…】
一群医生在手术台上低头看小孩子却什么也不做的那个镜头实在是太恐怖了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
