Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
电影本身的质量不重要，传达的意义高于电影。
医疗体系被击溃的时候，人类的生命和尊严会远远比影片中来得残酷吧。Jodie的口音真的好奶～
Couldn’t believe wear mask and keep social distance had become my daily routine.
中间那段崩溃大哭太让人难受了，朱迪演的太好了
早前听说养老院许多人去世，疫情爆发的前三个月care home去世占四成。得不到的help。jodie从mad fat diary和doctor foster不过六八年时间。可以的。
原本以为就是描述特殊护理院的日常，料想到了会有生离死别，会有艰辛，但没想到是一部以小见大的抗疫电影。没有过多的煽情，没有激烈的场面，却轻易就把当时历经这一切的人心中茫然、害怕，绝望一下勾了出来。说怎么会带着病人出走，我想在那种极端情况下，在末日感下，也是情有可原。另一方面，也讽刺了当局的该管不管、正做不做吧。
看到的第一部涉及新冠疫情的影片，在灾难面前人性与价值的呈现。这不是那些习惯了胜利叙事的人所习惯的角度，但却最能触动人心。
剧情有待完善，但方向是好的。起码敢问责啊！肯尼那一段看流泪了。还是爱朱迪演技。
别国拍的东西在反思不足，我国拍的东西企图叫观众感恩戴德。永远讨厌宏大叙事，因为“人”会被忽略。永远可以对Jodie Comer的演技有信心，即使没有脸部出镜只有声音的那段，角色满满的焦虑都从屏幕里溢出来。但最后出走的情节真的有些跳脱。
2.好人和坏人，都是出于自己的心理诉求和物质诉求。女主作为一个好的护工，是某种层面上的失败者，在这样的环境下能够收获被需求感。
对我来说，疫情背景真的能带来特别面还是太少了，除了无力善良，忙来忙去，解释了援助这个完整动作，更多的好像也就没了
这是我看的第一部新冠相关题材的影剧，片中许多的片段，都让人回想起两年前新冠爆发时，亲历过的恐惧和无奈的心境。西方百姓对疾病防控的认知和我们并没有大不同，只是他们更关注「个人」而不是「国家」罢了。
Help，说是援助，更像呼救，以及呼救得不到响应的无助。女主留守护理院的那个长镜头很实用，浅焦和晃动直击了挣扎和崩溃的全过程，明灭不定的感应灯也是妙用，有如一脚踏在人间一脚踩在地狱，也给剪辑点创造了机会。从崩溃到出逃，自然是对体制的不信任，但没费力去交代心理动机，仿佛摆明了左派立场，这些都是我骨子里的，最后对镜直接控诉也是愤怒到了一个顶点的意料中事。
五星的理由1 电影没有聚焦在疫情的主战场医院，而且选择了千千万万个疫情已经蔓延到但人类却束手无策的地方。五星的理由2 中间的一段长镜头，女主角在黑暗中孤立无援绝望得到处求助但是很遗憾事实就是这些人无暇被顾及或者说已经被放弃了，这样的场景是疫情刚刚爆发时无数个中国人的缩影。所有的镜头冷静又克制。
哭成牛，尊严是对生命更高的敬意，如果《中国医生》能理解这个本质关系，就不会把好政策拍成那种洗刷刷的感觉…
“前段时间我开始思考我要成为什么样的人了，可是……我有时候连自己在哪里都不知道。”
演的真好。大事件下小个体的挣扎，制度框架下的个人选择，有对抗也有无奈。抛开疫情，这个故事其实也可以成立。
成为护工本就不是一个容易的事情，年轻的女主奇异地真的很擅长，能理解那些难以沟通的情境。而家庭的问题，父母，也始终是烦恼的来源之一吧。新冠背景下，被护理的成人属于基本被选择性放弃的一群，护工面临的，孤立无援的场景，只能不要崩溃，边哭边继续做事。不得已利用了尚有较好能力的被看护者，也因此有了基于能力信任和愧疚和外界不当给药综合因素下的出逃。又一个像末路狂花一样的发展吧，没有末路狂花和国内的现状那么绝望和歇斯底里，但问题的性质是类似的。被选择性无视的一部分人，只能自己扛着，也许等来援兵，也许战死，如是而已。
前半小时跟拍女主进入疗养院，结识47岁便患有阿尔兹海默症的男主。
片子很好哭。我们拍的zg医生还不如人家拍的一个护工，差距….. 演技爆棚
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
