A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
经典的剧情，让我可以分配更多的精力沉浸在画面、音乐中。非常沉浸的观影体验。重复观看了“男主成年后划船出场那段长镜头，调度惊艳；最后一场火山熔岩的决斗，太美了，暴力美学！
熊与狼的力量在体内翻涌，总有神明指引着复仇之路。国王想要死在战场却躲不过弟弟的冷箭，神剑想要嗜血吞心在火山口斩草除根夺回属于自己的一切。从迷到信，哪有什么神明，不过是你在乎的东西支配着灵魂，让信念支撑着维京血脉。
所有人都在打打杀杀 只有安雅在独自美丽（谢谢老婆） 太野蛮了真的 血腥暴力✓
我很好奇这卓越的影像要是套在学校/古惑仔拼刀拼火的场面上该有多史诗（or中二？bushi）
维京金属mv 很贵但比较普通的那种 俄狄浦斯哈姆雷特宗教神话什么都有且只有一点点 但我还是看得津津有味 只能说当下需要看个这样的东西 不过可能为斯卡斯加德我也可以看两小时mv/风光片/whatever
我看完知道是讲的王子复仇记 但是里面的剧情也看的我神神叨叨的
看到後面發現：哇！暴君率眾妖害人！（誰懂？？）
就只有“好看”和“好听”，私以为故事跟去年《绿衣》是两个极端
哈姆雷特的原始版本，丹麦王子复仇记比莎士比亚更加朴实狂野，从一开始文邹邹的戏剧台词有点尴尬，然而渐入佳境，后面一连串的复仇简单粗暴，原始北欧的血性和单纯，外景地实在是美。
终于又有一部年度私人最佳了！！！这种沉浸其中的观影感太久远了！！！
[Century at Tanforan] 单调又过度的视听刺激稀释了悲剧性，露出人物和其关系的单薄；女性角色无一脱出女巫、附庸或荡妇的模板，母亲的塑造尤其令人失望。“你的剑太长了！”
其实男主一直重复的话就点名了主题，我要为父亲报仇，我要拯救母亲，我要杀了杀死父亲的叔父，可恨的是，母亲最后的背叛，可恶的施虐者，可恨的暴徒~！电影内容中充满血腥暴力，砍断肢体等内容，不适者慎重观看！
先知太牛比了，怎么做到的？说好的最后火焰剑呢
3.5，即便失去了前两部足够多的结构空间，依然能在一部主流大制作的传统故事中注入作者性和足够多的亮点，总体来说是惊喜的。
老父亲被新型电信诈骗，不先进行劝导而是转头就要打死亲爸血债血偿的行为真是好迷惑。还有，热爱泊车没人为你骄傲，只有拯救世界才能装逼成功。结尾有抖音今天爱答不理明天高攀不起的反转那味了。
大量的中文对白，相当多的中国元素，文戏武戏的比例，几场动作戏的创意，节奏等都完成的不错，很有诚意的尝试，非常希望能在内地顺利上映啊，让更多人至少看过后再去评价
看在花了不少钱的份上，给三星吧，看看风景还不错。其它的就太普通了。
在影院体会了一把度秒如年。话说脱都脱了，能不能漏点大家爱看的？不然真以为这电影能看得下去？
影像至上，文本稍逊，冗杂略长；虽然古典戏剧外加暴走的荷尔蒙，感觉上会很别扭，而且常规叙事和传统表达比较庸俗；但制作绝对走心，一板一眼无功无过，各要素搭配恰如其分，难得的良心佳片。
很好看。以及不是很明白有的短评到底想在美漫改编的美式超英里找到什么东西，西游记吗？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
