Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
想说赵震雄大叔终于演反派，然后一直等到跑字幕都没等来“反转”…
抠图效果明显，作为童话大王世界男一的皮皮鲁没什么存在感，不过小孩子还是挺喜欢看的。
4.如果素材耗尽，不妨试着演绎下朴槿惠相关；亦或者韩国的邪教。
两位男演员我都挺喜欢的，但故事节奏有点怪怪的，也不是说不紧凑，就是故事太密集，野心太大，什么都想放进去，但是作为一部犯罪题材的警匪片我还是觉得可以看一看。
前半部像戏里的高级西装一样干练有气质，后半部节奏混乱，让人摸不着头脑
警察办案没有经费甚至还要自掏腰包导致催生了延南会这个警察内部经济组织，有点扯……
演员很好，故事很好，就是拍的手法太烂了，没有把主题挖掘的够深。整个片子色调太暗了，看的全程眼睛难受╯﹏╰
不能光讲情怀，不讲逻辑。皮皮鲁完全是打酱油的。
鲁西西发型有点成熟啊。特效方面还需要加油！
7分~剧情紧凑，不拖沓，最后的皆大欢喜剧情有点点扯~
两位演员演技都可以，就是剧情感觉少了点东西
不能把小演员调教得跟《家有儿女》看齐，至少也别像六一表演这样行么……
三星半，好像过于复杂又过于简单的故事，再加上镜头节奏，最后更让我云里雾里了…
“你有好好成长呢，成为了比你父亲还狠的人”
强行灰色地带有点逻辑不通而且不符合常理，到后面甚至直接剧情玩脱，主线莫名其妙一下子就结束了编剧也不知道要做什么了。很失望，甚至不能称为虎头蛇尾，虎头蛇身吧。只能怪不得只有这个分数
非常棒的儿童电影，作为郑渊洁的粉丝，一开始担心童年的故事被魔改，不过看过之后发现并不需要这种担心。
考不过90就开除？我翻墙上网，打架斗殴，抽烟喝酒烫头，也就一个大过，最后毕业还给我消了。为了抗议应试教育，硬编一个尬得抠出三室一厅的故事，我是欣赏不了，小时候就看过一本皮皮鲁，我也不知道原著什么样。
不如改名叫借钱 就是有几个疑问点还没想明白
tnnd这比长津湖好看多了 除了把罐头小人公之于众之外都很好 鲁西西也好看 价值观也很正 中国需要这样的儿童电影
2022年的第一个四星作品。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
